Triple
T17122664
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rochin v. California |
E415505
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mapp v. Ohio |
E15566
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mapp v. Ohio | Statement: [Rochin v. California, relatedCase, Mapp v. Ohio]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mapp v. Ohio Context triple: [Rochin v. California, relatedCase, Mapp v. Ohio]
-
A.
Mapp v. Ohio
chosen
Mapp v. Ohio is a landmark 1961 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the exclusionary rule to the states, holding that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in state criminal prosecutions.
-
B.
Brandenburg v. Ohio
Brandenburg v. Ohio is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly strengthened free speech protections by establishing the "imminent lawless action" test for when advocacy of violence can be punished under the First Amendment.
-
C.
Schmerber v. California
Schmerber v. California is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that held police may, under certain exigent circumstances, conduct a warrantless blood draw from a suspected drunk driver without violating the Fourth Amendment.
-
D.
United States v. Wade
United States v. Wade is a landmark 1967 U.S. Supreme Court case that established a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel during post-indictment police lineups.
-
E.
Miranda v. Arizona
Miranda v. Arizona is a landmark 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the requirement for police to inform criminal suspects of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during custodial interrogations.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886d090cc8190a39cb94992586905 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3e80ac2cc819084fab829917c950a |
completed | April 18, 2026, 8:22 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a013a1062fc8190b1c4e97f42cf3faa |
completed | May 11, 2026, 2:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:36 a.m.