Triple

T1711762
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject TLS 1.2 Finished message E37197 entity
Predicate hasSecurityGoal P10168 FINISHED
Object mutual assurance of handshake consistency LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mutual assurance of handshake consistency | Statement: [TLS 1.2 Finished message, hasSecurityGoal, mutual assurance of handshake consistency]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSecurityGoal
Context triple: [TLS 1.2 Finished message, hasSecurityGoal, mutual assurance of handshake consistency]
  • A. securityGoal chosen
    Indicates that an action, system, or policy is intended to achieve, support, or satisfy a specified security objective or protection target.
  • B. hasSecurityNotion
    Indicates that one entity possesses, defines, or is associated with a particular concept or notion of security in relation to another entity or context.
  • C. hasPolicyGoal
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or aims to achieve, a specific policy objective or target.
  • D. hasSecurityPresence
    Indicates that some form of security personnel, system, or measures are present at or associated with an entity or location.
  • E. hasSecurityStandard
    Indicates that an entity complies with, follows, or is governed by a specified security standard or framework.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8861912dc8190931af43b4b9158a7 completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ab7521878c8190b9e7739b8c3fc705 completed March 7, 2026, 12:45 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aa61bd46d48190915500d75a9d8e94 completed March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.