Triple

T17111306
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject David King E415230 entity
Predicate partyToProceeding P15954 FINISHED
Object King v. Burwell E89330 NE FINISHED

Named-entity recognition

Before disambiguation, gpt-5-mini classified whether the object phrase is a named entity — the step behind the object's NE type shown above.

Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: King v. Burwell | Statement: [David King, partyToProceeding, King v. Burwell]

Disambiguation candidates (2 decisions)

The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: King v. Burwell
Context triple: [David King, partyToProceeding, King v. Burwell]
  • A. King v. Burwell chosen
    King v. Burwell is a landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the availability of federal tax credits for health insurance purchased on exchanges under the Affordable Care Act.
  • B. Zubik v. Burwell
    Zubik v. Burwell is a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning religious nonprofits’ objections to the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage mandate and the accommodation process for opting out.
  • C. NFIB v. Sebelius
    NFIB v. Sebelius is the landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the Affordable Care Act, notably ruling that its individual mandate could be sustained under Congress’s taxing power.
  • D. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
    Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that closely held for-profit corporations can claim religious exemptions from certain federal regulations under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
  • E. Eldred v. Ashcroft
    Eldred v. Ashcroft is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of extending copyright terms, affirming Congress’s broad power over copyright duration.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target predicate: partyToProceeding
Context triple: [David King, partyToProceeding, King v. Burwell]
  • A. partyToCase chosen
    Indicates that an entity is involved in a legal case as one of its formal participants (e.g., plaintiff, defendant, or other party).
  • B. typeOfProceedings
    Indicates the specific category or kind of legal or formal process under which an action or case is being conducted.
  • C. legalProcedureUsed
    Indicates that a particular legal procedure or process is applied or employed in relation to a case, action, or legal matter.
  • D. otherSignificantParty
    Indicates that an entity has another important associated party, such as a key counterpart, partner, or involved participant in a relationship or transaction.
  • E. partyTypePlaintiffs
    Indicates the classification or category of the parties serving as plaintiffs in a legal action.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

Stage Batch ID Job type Status
creating batch_69d886d090cc8190a39cb94992586905 elicitation completed
NER batch_69e3dc2a7f2c81908eb19594b6accab7 ner completed
NED1 batch_6a01482766508190b2af157bf039000d ned_source_triple completed
PD batch_69e35d6b1b988190a8d6b6fe78c35e59 pd completed
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:35 a.m.