Triple
T1711001
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Committee of the Regions |
E36981
|
entity |
| Predicate | givesOpinionOn |
P32222
|
FINISHED |
| Object | proposed EU legislation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: proposed EU legislation | Statement: [Committee of the Regions, givesOpinionOn, proposed EU legislation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: givesOpinionOn Context triple: [Committee of the Regions, givesOpinionOn, proposed EU legislation]
-
A.
opinionBy
Indicates that a particular opinion, viewpoint, or judgment is expressed or held by a specific entity.
-
B.
givesLegalOpinionTo
Indicates that one party provides a formal legal judgment, advice, or interpretation to another party.
-
C.
hasDifferentOpinionsOn
Indicates that two or more entities hold differing views or judgments regarding a particular topic, issue, or subject.
-
D.
notableOpinion
Indicates that one entity holds a significant or widely recognized opinion or viewpoint about another entity.
-
E.
languageOfOpinion
Indicates that a particular opinion is expressed or communicated in a specified language.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88617439c819094ffb5d16a0f6307 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab7521878c8190b9e7739b8c3fc705 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 12:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61bd46d48190915500d75a9d8e94 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ab752034348190a1cc20955ed24f6f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 12:45 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.