Triple

T17107039
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject David Kato E415126 entity
Predicate ethnicGroup P194 FINISHED
Object Baganda E275004 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Baganda | Statement: [David Kato, ethnicGroup, Baganda]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Baganda
Context triple: [David Kato, ethnicGroup, Baganda]
  • A. Baganda chosen
    The Baganda are the largest ethnic group in Uganda, historically centered in the Buganda Kingdom and known for their rich cultural traditions and Luganda language.
  • B. Luganda
    Luganda is a major Bantu language spoken primarily in Uganda, serving as a key lingua franca and cultural language of the Baganda people.
  • C. Kitwe
    Kitwe is a major mining and industrial city in Zambia’s Copperbelt Province, known as one of the country’s largest urban and economic centers.
  • D. Kikongo
    Kikongo is a Bantu language widely spoken in Central Africa, particularly in the western regions of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and neighboring countries.
  • E. Mwera people
    The Mwera people are a Bantu ethnic group of southeastern Tanzania known for their distinct language, matrilineal social organization, and traditional agricultural livelihoods.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886cfc8e88190b05ba466edd35591 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3dc280b0c8190b9e620b90e0d4b40 completed April 18, 2026, 7:31 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a013a019540819083ce6100b24f8cfb completed May 11, 2026, 2:08 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:35 a.m.