Triple
T17103617
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Acción Democrática |
E415040
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableCrisis |
P125935
|
FINISHED |
| Object | internal splits and judicial intervention in the 2010s |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: internal splits and judicial intervention in the 2010s | Statement: [Acción Democrática, notableCrisis, internal splits and judicial intervention in the 2010s]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableCrisis Context triple: [Acción Democrática, notableCrisis, internal splits and judicial intervention in the 2010s]
-
A.
typeOfCrisis
Indicates the specific category or nature of a crisis that an entity is experiencing or associated with.
-
B.
majorCrisis
Indicates a severe, high-impact crisis or emergency situation affecting an entity or system.
-
C.
crisisRelatedTo
Indicates a relationship where one situation, event, or condition is connected to, associated with, or relevant to a crisis.
-
D.
notableDisasterType
Indicates the specific kind or category of disaster for which something (such as a place, event, or entity) is notable or best known.
-
E.
subsequentCrisis
Indicates that one crisis occurs after and as a consequence or continuation of another earlier crisis.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886cfc8e88190b05ba466edd35591 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3dc2591a881909c5f4f7db47f4d6c |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e35d6b1b988190a8d6b6fe78c35e59 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:31 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e37542d060819082aa73948eb8ebd4 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 12:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:35 a.m.