Triple

T17087883
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject La Crosse County E414646 entity
Predicate hasMajorRiver P165 FINISHED
Object La Crosse River NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: La Crosse River | Statement: [La Crosse County, hasMajorRiver, La Crosse River]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: La Crosse River
Context triple: [La Crosse County, hasMajorRiver, La Crosse River]
  • A. La Crosse River chosen
    The La Crosse River is a tributary of the Mississippi River in western Wisconsin, flowing through Fort McCoy and the city of La Crosse.
  • B. Rum River
    Rum River is a river in central Minnesota that flows south from Mille Lacs Lake to the Mississippi River, passing through communities such as Anoka along the way.
  • C. Elm River
    Elm River is a lesser-known tributary waterway that feeds into the James River within its watershed.
  • D. Thief River
    Thief River is a tributary stream in northwestern Minnesota that flows into the Red Lake River and helps drain the surrounding agricultural and wetland areas.
  • E. Nemadji River
    The Nemadji River is a tributary in northeastern Minnesota and northwestern Wisconsin that flows into Lake Superior near the Duluth–Superior harbor, influencing the region’s watershed and estuarine environment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886cfc8e88190b05ba466edd35591 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3dbe92e488190b947287a968086d5 completed April 18, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:35 a.m.