Triple

T17080226
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ellingwood Point E414450 entity
Predicate partOfCountyHighPointArea P112251 FINISHED
Object Alamosa County high point region LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Alamosa County high point region | Statement: [Ellingwood Point, partOfCountyHighPointArea, Alamosa County high point region]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partOfCountyHighPointArea
Context triple: [Ellingwood Point, partOfCountyHighPointArea, Alamosa County high point region]
  • A. highestPointRegion
    Indicates that one location is the highest point within a specified region.
  • B. areaPeak
    Indicates that a specified location or region is the highest point (peak) within a given area or spatial extent.
  • C. recognizedAsStateHighPointSince
    Indicates that an entity has been officially acknowledged as the highest point of a state starting from a specified date or time.
  • D. trailHighPointOf
    Indicates that one location is the highest elevation point along a specified trail or route.
  • E. containsHighestPointOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity includes within its boundaries the location of the highest point of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886cef44c8190ba56c44b4e863e64 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3dbe24a6481908b4596c95220df4a completed April 18, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e35d642f74819098c014135e249b27 completed April 18, 2026, 10:31 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:34 a.m.