Triple
T1707547
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GTMO |
E36903
|
entity |
| Predicate | subjectOf |
P38
|
FINISHED |
| Object | U.S. Supreme Court case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld |
E139205
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: U.S. Supreme Court case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld | Statement: [GTMO, subjectOf, U.S. Supreme Court case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: U.S. Supreme Court case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld Context triple: [GTMO, subjectOf, U.S. Supreme Court case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld]
-
A.
opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
chosen
The opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice John Paul Stevens, that limited presidential wartime authority by ruling that the military commissions set up to try Guantánamo detainees violated U.S. law and the Geneva Conventions.
-
B.
Hamdi
Hamdi is a common given name and nickname in Arabic-speaking cultures, often used as a familiar or affectionate form of longer names such as Ahmed.
-
C.
INS v. Chadha
INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
-
D.
United States v. Chelsea Manning
United States v. Chelsea Manning was the high-profile court-martial of U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning for leaking classified documents to WikiLeaks, resulting in a landmark conviction under U.S. military and national security law.
-
E.
opinion in Rasul v. Bush
The opinion in Rasul v. Bush is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision authored by Justice John Paul Stevens that held federal courts have jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions from foreign nationals detained at Guantánamo Bay.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88617439c819094ffb5d16a0f6307 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aa62f6fc9c8190b61cc9872cc2adc0 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:15 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ada0cf5a3481908434c725e85360a2 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.