Triple

T17070705
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Statutes of Kilkenny E414209 entity
Predicate soughtToReinforce P29894 FINISHED
Object English common law in Ireland LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English common law in Ireland | Statement: [Statutes of Kilkenny, soughtToReinforce, English common law in Ireland]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: soughtToReinforce
Context triple: [Statutes of Kilkenny, soughtToReinforce, English common law in Ireland]
  • A. reinforcedIn chosen
    Indicates that one entity is strengthened, supported, or made more robust within, or as a result of conditions in, another entity or context.
  • B. reinforcedByResolution
    Indicates that something is strengthened, supported, or made more effective as a result of a specific resolution or formal decision.
  • C. requiresForDefense
    Indicates that one entity must have or obtain another entity as a necessary condition to provide or maintain defense.
  • D. wasFortifiedBy
    Indicates that a place or structure received defensive strengthening or fortification through the actions or resources of a specified agent or entity.
  • E. soughtToMaintain
    Indicates an entity’s deliberate effort or intention to keep another entity or condition in its existing state over time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886cef44c8190ba56c44b4e863e64 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3dbc0982c8190916f9905ddb5e575 completed April 18, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e35d642f74819098c014135e249b27 completed April 18, 2026, 10:31 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:34 a.m.