Triple
T17059387
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mackenzie–Papineau Battalion |
E413913
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusInCanadaAtTheTime |
P125689
|
FINISHED |
| Object | unofficial |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unofficial | Statement: [Mackenzie–Papineau Battalion, legalStatusInCanadaAtTheTime, unofficial]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusInCanadaAtTheTime Context triple: [Mackenzie–Papineau Battalion, legalStatusInCanadaAtTheTime, unofficial]
-
A.
legalStatusInMostCountries
Indicates the typical legal classification or treatment of something across the majority of countries.
-
B.
legalStatusAtArrival
Indicates the legal status or classification an entity held at the time it first arrived at a particular place or jurisdiction.
-
C.
legalStatusInManyCountries
Indicates that the subject has a particular legal classification or standing that is recognized across numerous countries.
-
D.
hasHighestLegalStatusWithinCountry
Indicates that an entity holds the topmost legally recognized status or rank within a specific country, above all other comparable statuses.
-
E.
legalStatusAtIssue
Indicates that the legal status of an entity is the central subject of dispute, consideration, or determination in a legal context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886cde3d481908d4d01ba88ba7eb7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3db7c21a881909bfb67080706612f |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e35d60a588819084f53ef9f8b2e7c0 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e3753f93c88190808fec5692f66699 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 12:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:34 a.m.