Triple

T17051497
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Verifiable Random Function E413706 entity
Predicate hasComponentAlgorithm P125667 FINISHED
Object key generation algorithm LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: key generation algorithm | Statement: [Verifiable Random Function, hasComponentAlgorithm, key generation algorithm]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasComponentAlgorithm
Context triple: [Verifiable Random Function, hasComponentAlgorithm, key generation algorithm]
  • A. hasComponentProgram
    Indicates that one program includes or is composed of another program as a component or sub-program.
  • B. hasAlgorithmName
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or identified by a specific algorithm name.
  • C. hasSubcomponent
    Indicates that one entity is a constituent part or component of another, larger entity.
  • D. hasComponentModel
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with a specific component model as part of its structure or configuration.
  • E. hasComponentGroup
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with a specific group of components treated as a single unit.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886cde3d481908d4d01ba88ba7eb7 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3daa26e84819098b41ae15618e813 completed April 18, 2026, 7:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e35d60a588819084f53ef9f8b2e7c0 completed April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e3753f93c88190808fec5692f66699 completed April 18, 2026, 12:12 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:34 a.m.