Triple
T17048316
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yaxhá |
E413627
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasGeographicalCoordinate |
P10142
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 17.071°N 89.399°W |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 17.071°N 89.399°W | Statement: [Yaxhá, hasGeographicalCoordinate, 17.071°N 89.399°W]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasGeographicalCoordinate Context triple: [Yaxhá, hasGeographicalCoordinate, 17.071°N 89.399°W]
-
A.
hasGeocode
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific geographic coordinate or coded location reference.
-
B.
hasCoordinates
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with specific spatial coordinates that define its position in a given reference system.
-
C.
hasGeographicBasis
Indicates that something is grounded in, derived from, or defined by a particular geographic location or area.
-
D.
hasGeographicType
Indicates that an entity is associated with or classified by a specific type or category of geographic feature or area.
-
E.
isGeographicalEntity
Indicates that something exists as a distinct geographic feature, area, or place within physical space.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886cd18288190b006abab23f811b7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3da9f799c8190a683ae38cd990643 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e35d60a588819084f53ef9f8b2e7c0 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:34 a.m.