Triple

T17045391
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tomini Bay E413553 entity
Predicate relativeConservationStatus P125627 FINISHED
Object relatively less developed LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: relatively less developed | Statement: [Tomini Bay, relativeConservationStatus, relatively less developed]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relativeConservationStatus
Context triple: [Tomini Bay, relativeConservationStatus, relatively less developed]
  • A. conservationStatus
    Indicates the level of risk or protection category assigned to an entity, typically reflecting how threatened it is with extinction or decline.
  • B. typeOfConservation
    Indicates the specific kind or category of conservation practice, method, or approach that applies to an entity or situation.
  • C. conservationStatusTrend
    Indicates the direction or pattern of change over time in the conservation status of an entity (e.g., improving, stable, or declining).
  • D. stateOfConservation
    Indicates the condition or preservation status of an entity, typically in terms of how intact, degraded, or at risk it is.
  • E. hasConservationConcernIn
    Indicates that an entity is subject to a specified conservation concern status within a particular geographic area or jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886cd18288190b006abab23f811b7 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3da9d7e988190a5e3991c7123f9b0 completed April 18, 2026, 7:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e35d60a588819084f53ef9f8b2e7c0 completed April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e3753f93c88190808fec5692f66699 completed April 18, 2026, 12:12 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:33 a.m.