Triple

T17040869
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject theta-method E413442 entity
Predicate hasParameterType P125616 FINISHED
Object weighting parameter LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: weighting parameter | Statement: [theta-method, hasParameterType, weighting parameter]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasParameterType
Context triple: [theta-method, hasParameterType, weighting parameter]
  • A. hasParameter
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific parameter that defines or constrains some aspect of its behavior, configuration, or characteristics.
  • B. hasParType
    Indicates that an entity has a specific parent type or category to which it belongs.
  • C. hasMethodType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or characterized by, a specific type or category of method used or applied in its context.
  • D. hasParameterization
    Indicates that one entity serves as the specific parameterization or parameter-setting scheme used to define or configure another entity.
  • E. hasPropertyType
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a specific type or category of property.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886cd18288190b006abab23f811b7 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3d8f6a0c08190a838279b83b55b72 completed April 18, 2026, 7:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e35d60a588819084f53ef9f8b2e7c0 completed April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e3753f93c88190808fec5692f66699 completed April 18, 2026, 12:12 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:33 a.m.