Triple
T17021425
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | argument from degrees of perfection |
E412954
|
entity |
| Predicate | infersExistenceOf |
P42357
|
FINISHED |
| Object | maximally perfect being |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: maximally perfect being | Statement: [argument from degrees of perfection, infersExistenceOf, maximally perfect being]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: infersExistenceOf Context triple: [argument from degrees of perfection, infersExistenceOf, maximally perfect being]
-
A.
concludesExistenceOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity determines or infers that another entity exists.
-
B.
proposesExistenceOf
Indicates that one entity puts forward or suggests that another entity should exist or be brought into existence.
-
C.
existsIf
Indicates that the existence or validity of one entity or condition depends on the presence or truth of another specified condition.
-
D.
existsAs
Indicates that one entity has the same identity or manifestation as another, effectively asserting they are the same existing thing or state.
-
E.
existsFor
Indicates that something is present, available, or holds true for a particular entity, context, or condition.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886cc4170819093deddc7b8b4b6a7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3d5d0dc848190a267f8542dfb86a6 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e35d5be7f48190af9db67a1e23850f |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:33 a.m.