Triple

T17020034
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Young inequality for convolutions E412923 entity
Predicate conditionOnExponents P125528 FINISHED
Object 1 ≤ p,q,r ≤ ∞ LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1 ≤ p,q,r ≤ ∞ | Statement: [Young inequality for convolutions, conditionOnExponents, 1 ≤ p,q,r ≤ ∞]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conditionOnExponents
Context triple: [Young inequality for convolutions, conditionOnExponents, 1 ≤ p,q,r ≤ ∞]
  • A. hasExponentialFactor
    Indicates that one entity serves as an exponential factor or exponent applied to another entity in a mathematical or computational expression.
  • B. exponent
    Indicates that one quantity is raised to the power of another, expressing repeated multiplication of a base by itself.
  • C. allowsExponentType
    Indicates that one entity permits or supports the use of a specified type for an exponent in an operation or expression.
  • D. typicalExponent
    Indicates that one quantity serves as the characteristic or standard exponent associated with another quantity or expression.
  • E. baseOfExponentialTerm
    Indicates that one quantity serves as the base in an exponential expression or term involving another quantity as the exponent.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886cc4170819093deddc7b8b4b6a7 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3d482c3a0819099e6ea4acb0a08ee completed April 18, 2026, 6:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e35d5be7f48190af9db67a1e23850f completed April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e3753f93c88190808fec5692f66699 completed April 18, 2026, 12:12 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:33 a.m.