Triple
T17016410
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Crown Court at Mold |
E412831
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLevelInJudicialHierarchy |
P6712
|
FINISHED |
| Object | first-instance criminal court |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: first-instance criminal court | Statement: [Crown Court at Mold, hasLevelInJudicialHierarchy, first-instance criminal court]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLevelInJudicialHierarchy Context triple: [Crown Court at Mold, hasLevelInJudicialHierarchy, first-instance criminal court]
-
A.
hasLegalHierarchy
Indicates that one entity holds a higher or subordinate legal status, authority, or jurisdiction in relation to another within a formal legal structure.
-
B.
hadCourtLevel
Indicates the specific hierarchical level of the court at which a legal case or judicial action took place.
-
C.
hasHigherJurisdiction
Indicates that one authority or legal body possesses superior legal power or decision-making control over another within a defined domain or scope.
-
D.
jurisdictionLevel
chosen
Indicates the scope or tier of authority under which an entity or action is legally governed or regulated.
-
E.
hasAppellateJurisdictionIn
Indicates that one legal authority has the power to review and decide appeals arising from cases within a specified court, region, or jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886cc4170819093deddc7b8b4b6a7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3d47fec248190bf261cac920291b1 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:59 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e35d5be7f48190af9db67a1e23850f |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:33 a.m.