Triple
T17009943
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Buka Island |
E412670
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLanguage |
P15
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Halia language |
E851582
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Halia language | Statement: [Buka Island, hasLanguage, Halia language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Halia language Context triple: [Buka Island, hasLanguage, Halia language]
-
A.
Halyikwamai language
The Halyikwamai language is an extinct Yuman language once spoken by the Halyikwamai people along the lower Colorado River region of the southwestern United States and northern Mexico.
-
B.
Haliti language
The Haliti language, also known as Paresí, is an Arawakan indigenous language spoken by the Paresí (Haliti) people of Brazil’s Mato Grosso region.
-
C.
Belhare language
The Belhare language is a Kiranti language of the Sino-Tibetan family spoken by the Belhare community in eastern Nepal.
-
D.
Lehali language
chosen
The Lehali language is an Oceanic language spoken by a small community on the Banks Islands in northern Vanuatu.
-
E.
Halchidhoma language
The Halchidhoma language is an extinct Yuman language once spoken by the Halchidhoma people along the lower Colorado River in the southwestern United States.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886cc4170819093deddc7b8b4b6a7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3d47a8444819081f1262eb7dbda40 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:59 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00dc241ec88190a3e868ab88b26f09 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:33 a.m.