Triple

T17006747
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cheom E412589 entity
Predicate correspondsToHanja P27905 FINISHED
Object LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 詹 | Statement: [Cheom, correspondsToHanja, 詹]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: correspondsToHanja
Context triple: [Cheom, correspondsToHanja, 詹]
  • A. hanjaName chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the Sino-Korean (hanja) written form corresponding to the name of another entity.
  • B. correspondsToChineseCharacter
    Indicates that one entity is the equivalent or representation of a specific Chinese written character.
  • C. usesHanjaVariants
    Indicates that one entity employs or incorporates alternative Hanja (Chinese character) forms corresponding to another entity.
  • D. correspondsToChineseSurname
    Indicates that one entity is the Chinese surname equivalent or counterpart of another entity.
  • E. hasTraditionalCharacter
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or represented by a traditional (non-simplified or historically established) written character form.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886cb581c8190ab05f4b429c9cd85 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3d3831268819089286053a5acf653 completed April 18, 2026, 6:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e35d552bc08190af17ef7659e094ef completed April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:32 a.m.