Triple

T17006462
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jyutping E412583 entity
Predicate usesToneNumbers P126167 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Jyutping, usesToneNumbers, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesToneNumbers
Context triple: [Jyutping, usesToneNumbers, true]
  • A. usesNumeralsFrom
    Indicates that one writing system, notation, or representation employs the numeral symbols originating from another system.
  • B. telephoneStandard
    Indicates that there is a relationship involving the use of a particular telephone standard or protocol for communication between entities.
  • C. usesOpenNumberingPlan
    Indicates that a telecommunication system or region employs an open numbering plan, where phone numbers can vary in length rather than following a fixed-length format.
  • D. usesClosedNumberingPlan
    Indicates that a telecommunication system or network follows a closed numbering plan, where phone numbers have fixed lengths and formats without requiring variable-length dialing.
  • E. supportsTone
    Indicates that one entity is compatible with, enables, or can correctly handle a specified tone or tonal characteristic of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886cb581c8190ab05f4b429c9cd85 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3d3831268819089286053a5acf653 completed April 18, 2026, 6:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e35d552bc08190af17ef7659e094ef completed April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e378e037c88190935d732e0f10d5d7 completed April 18, 2026, 12:28 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:32 a.m.