Triple
T17005996
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 19-840 |
E412570
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius |
E13966
|
NE FINISHED |
Named-entity recognition
Before disambiguation, gpt-5-mini classified whether the object phrase is a named entity — the step behind the object's NE type shown above.
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius | Statement: [19-840, relatedCase, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius]
Disambiguation candidates (1 decision)
The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius Context triple: [19-840, relatedCase, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius]
-
A.
NFIB v. Sebelius
chosen
NFIB v. Sebelius is the landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the Affordable Care Act, notably ruling that its individual mandate could be sustained under Congress’s taxing power.
-
B.
Zubik v. Burwell
Zubik v. Burwell is a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning religious nonprofits’ objections to the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage mandate and the accommodation process for opting out.
-
C.
King v. Burwell
King v. Burwell is a landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the availability of federal tax credits for health insurance purchased on exchanges under the Affordable Care Act.
-
D.
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that closely held for-profit corporations can claim religious exemptions from certain federal regulations under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
-
E.
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt is a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down Texas abortion restrictions as imposing an undue burden on women’s constitutional right to access abortion.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
| Stage | Batch ID | Job type | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| creating | batch_69d886cb581c8190ab05f4b429c9cd85 |
elicitation | completed |
| NER | batch_69e3d3831268819089286053a5acf653 |
ner | completed |
| NED1 | batch_6a00dc2035848190bf299875d37c8ac7 |
ned_source_triple | completed |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:32 a.m.