Triple

T17005693
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 111-148 E412563 entity
Predicate subjectOf P38 FINISHED
Object Supreme Court case King v. Burwell E89330 NE FINISHED

Named-entity recognition

Before disambiguation, gpt-5-mini classified whether the object phrase is a named entity — the step behind the object's NE type shown above.

Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court case King v. Burwell | Statement: [111-148, subjectOf, Supreme Court case King v. Burwell]

Disambiguation candidates (1 decision)

The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Supreme Court case King v. Burwell
Context triple: [111-148, subjectOf, Supreme Court case King v. Burwell]
  • A. King v. Burwell chosen
    King v. Burwell is a landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the availability of federal tax credits for health insurance purchased on exchanges under the Affordable Care Act.
  • B. Zubik v. Burwell
    Zubik v. Burwell is a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning religious nonprofits’ objections to the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage mandate and the accommodation process for opting out.
  • C. NFIB v. Sebelius
    NFIB v. Sebelius is the landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the Affordable Care Act, notably ruling that its individual mandate could be sustained under Congress’s taxing power.
  • D. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
    Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that closely held for-profit corporations can claim religious exemptions from certain federal regulations under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
  • E. Eldred v. Ashcroft
    Eldred v. Ashcroft is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of extending copyright terms, affirming Congress’s broad power over copyright duration.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

Stage Batch ID Job type Status
creating batch_69d886cb581c8190ab05f4b429c9cd85 elicitation completed
NER batch_69e3d382400c819092ec0ca0de815888 ner completed
NED1 batch_6a011b451ff88190b63f4ebddf93f153 ned_source_triple completed
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:32 a.m.