Triple

T16998850
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Paper Mate Flair E412385 entity
Predicate writingLine P126107 FINISHED
Object medium line width (for medium point variant) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: medium line width (for medium point variant) | Statement: [Paper Mate Flair, writingLine, medium line width (for medium point variant)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: writingLine
Context triple: [Paper Mate Flair, writingLine, medium line width (for medium point variant)]
  • A. writingForm
    Indicates the specific script, notation, or written representation used to express a piece of language or content.
  • B. formedLine
    Indicates that an entity has arranged itself or others into a line or linear formation.
  • C. written
    Indicates that one entity has created or authored a text, document, or written work involving or about another entity.
  • D. willWrittenIn
    Indicates that a legal will was authored, drafted, or formally written in a specified location or jurisdiction.
  • E. writingTool
    Indicates that one entity serves as a tool or instrument used by another entity for the act of writing.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886cb581c8190ab05f4b429c9cd85 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3d37cd6248190a7202ae754882640 completed April 18, 2026, 6:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e35d552bc08190af17ef7659e094ef completed April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e378e037c88190935d732e0f10d5d7 completed April 18, 2026, 12:28 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:32 a.m.