Triple

T16998747
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject InkJoy E412383 entity
Predicate hasWritingTipType P126103 FINISHED
Object medium point LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: medium point | Statement: [InkJoy, hasWritingTipType, medium point]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasWritingTipType
Context triple: [InkJoy, hasWritingTipType, medium point]
  • A. hasWritingType
    Indicates that one entity is associated with, or characterized by, a particular type or form of writing.
  • B. hasWrittenFor
    Indicates that one entity has created written content (such as articles, stories, or texts) for or on behalf of another entity, typically a publication, organization, or platform.
  • C. isWritten
    Indicates that a text, document, or content has been created or recorded in written form by an agent.
  • D. hasWrittenWorkType
    Indicates that an entity (typically a written work) is associated with a specific type or category of written work (such as novel, article, report, etc.).
  • E. writTypes
    Indicates the types or categories of writs (formal written legal orders) associated with an action or entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886cb581c8190ab05f4b429c9cd85 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3d37c16d081908ea5e25c992cb254 completed April 18, 2026, 6:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e35d552bc08190af17ef7659e094ef completed April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e378e037c88190935d732e0f10d5d7 completed April 18, 2026, 12:28 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:32 a.m.