Triple
T16994501
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tina "Teeny" Tercell |
E412278
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAspiration |
P20166
|
FINISHED |
| Object | glamorous lifestyle |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: glamorous lifestyle | Statement: [Tina "Teeny" Tercell, hasAspiration, glamorous lifestyle]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAspiration Context triple: [Tina "Teeny" Tercell, hasAspiration, glamorous lifestyle]
-
A.
aspiration
chosen
Indicates that one entity has a strong desire, goal, or ambition directed toward achieving or becoming another entity or state.
-
B.
engineAspiration
Indicates whether and how an engine’s intake air is boosted or modified (e.g., naturally aspirated, turbocharged, supercharged).
-
C.
has
Indicates that one entity possesses, owns, contains, or includes another entity as part of its state or composition.
-
D.
hasPotential
Indicates that an entity possesses the capacity or possibility to develop, achieve, or exhibit a particular state, quality, or outcome in the future.
-
E.
hasPar
Indicates a relationship where one entity has another entity as its parent.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886cb581c8190ab05f4b429c9cd85 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3d285f35881908c32b2f27ba7f0ac |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e35d552bc08190af17ef7659e094ef |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:32 a.m.