Triple
T16973662
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Luna County, New Mexico |
E411750
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCountyCodeType |
P125446
|
FINISHED |
| Object | FIPS code |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: FIPS code | Statement: [Luna County, New Mexico, hasCountyCodeType, FIPS code]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCountyCodeType Context triple: [Luna County, New Mexico, hasCountyCodeType, FIPS code]
-
A.
hasCountyCode
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific county identified by a standardized county code.
-
B.
hasCountyNumberPlateCode
Indicates that an entity (such as a vehicle or registration) bears a number plate code that corresponds to a specific county.
-
C.
includesCounty
Indicates that a larger geographic or administrative region contains or encompasses a specific county within its boundaries.
-
D.
hasCountyEquivalentStatus
Indicates that an entity holds an administrative or legal status equivalent to that of a county within a given jurisdiction.
-
E.
hasParentCounty
Indicates that a given county is administratively or geographically contained within, and subordinate to, a specified parent county.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886ca8f348190812768ea8d5055ce |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3d0af06688190a77682aa297cd27e |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e35d4dff4881909b384e30f2d36bff |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e3753f93c88190808fec5692f66699 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 12:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:31 a.m.