Triple
T1696867
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Thames Barrier |
E36676
|
entity |
| Predicate | floodRiskAreaProtected |
P25048
|
FINISHED |
| Object | central London |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: central London | Statement: [Thames Barrier, floodRiskAreaProtected, central London]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: floodRiskAreaProtected Context triple: [Thames Barrier, floodRiskAreaProtected, central London]
-
A.
hasFloodRisk
Indicates that an entity is exposed to a potential or expected risk of flooding under certain conditions.
-
B.
hasFloodplain
Indicates that an area or location lies within the floodplain associated with a particular water body or flooding source.
-
C.
hasFloodProtectionInfrastructure
chosen
Indicates that there exists built or implemented infrastructure designed to protect against or mitigate flooding for the referenced entity.
-
D.
hasProtectedAreaStatus
Indicates that an area is officially designated and managed as a protected area under relevant conservation or legal frameworks.
-
E.
hasProtectedArea
Indicates that an entity possesses, includes, or is associated with a designated protected area for conservation or restricted use.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a886163dec8190859c514232a37a05 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aaf169da888190b3aa334752f1952b |
completed | March 6, 2026, 3:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61b8ce348190b46154af0b041ff0 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.