Triple

T16965506
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States federal system E411529 entity
Predicate allowsConcurrentPowers P33660 FINISHED
Object taxation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: taxation | Statement: [United States federal system, allowsConcurrentPowers, taxation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allowsConcurrentPowers
Context triple: [United States federal system, allowsConcurrentPowers, taxation]
  • A. hasNumberOfPowers
    Indicates the quantity of distinct powers or abilities that an entity possesses.
  • B. supportsMultiplePowerRoles
    Indicates that an entity can simultaneously handle or be assigned more than one distinct power-related role.
  • C. usesPowerFor
    Indicates that one entity applies or exploits a particular power, energy, or capability for a specific purpose or activity.
  • D. hasMultipleHoldersSimultaneously chosen
    Indicates that a given item, role, or resource is concurrently possessed, controlled, or occupied by more than one holder at the same time.
  • E. restrictsPowerOf
    Indicates that one entity limits, constrains, or reduces the authority, control, or influence that another entity can exercise.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886c9c9d481909afe222093641cae completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3d0a3cecc8190a490573adce80cca completed April 18, 2026, 6:42 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e35d4dff4881909b384e30f2d36bff completed April 18, 2026, 10:30 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:31 a.m.