Triple
T16962094
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Indiana judicial discipline |
E411453
|
entity |
| Predicate | allowsComplaintsFrom |
P273
|
FINISHED |
| Object | members of the public |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: members of the public | Statement: [Indiana judicial discipline, allowsComplaintsFrom, members of the public]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allowsComplaintsFrom Context triple: [Indiana judicial discipline, allowsComplaintsFrom, members of the public]
-
A.
handlesComplaintsOn
Indicates that one entity is responsible for receiving, managing, or resolving complaints related to another entity.
-
B.
requiresForIndividualComplaints
Indicates that one party’s ability to file or pursue individual complaints is contingent upon the involvement, approval, or fulfillment of conditions by another specified entity or factor.
-
C.
admitsFrom
Indicates that one entity accepts or enrolls individuals coming from another specified source or institution.
-
D.
allows
chosen
Indicates that one entity grants permission, capability, or opportunity for another entity to perform an action or be in a certain state.
-
E.
canBeAppealedTo
Indicates that a decision, action, or authority is subject to being challenged or reviewed by a higher or alternative authority through an appeal process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886c9c9d481909afe222093641cae |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3d021c5508190b6e3106554c07a9c |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e32b9cddf88190bc42709604047353 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:31 a.m.