Triple
T16962081
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Indiana judicial discipline |
E411453
|
entity |
| Predicate | overseenBy |
P86
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications |
E411476
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications | Statement: [Indiana judicial discipline, overseenBy, Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications Context triple: [Indiana judicial discipline, overseenBy, Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications]
-
A.
Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications
chosen
The Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications is a state body responsible for overseeing the ethical conduct, discipline, and professional standards of judges within Indiana’s judiciary.
-
B.
Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission
The Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission is a state body responsible for screening, selecting, and recommending candidates for judicial office, including the Chief Justice, to ensure a qualified and impartial judiciary.
-
C.
Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct
The Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct is an independent state agency responsible for investigating and disciplining judges and judicial officers in Washington to uphold ethical standards and public confidence in the judiciary.
-
D.
Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission
The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission is the body responsible for investigating and prosecuting allegations of professional misconduct by attorneys licensed to practice law in Indiana.
-
E.
Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct
The Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct is an independent body that investigates complaints and enforces ethical standards for judges within Arizona’s court system.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886c9c9d481909afe222093641cae |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3d021c5508190b6e3106554c07a9c |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:40 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00dc09386c819088bdb2548f3fb5c8 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:31 a.m.