Triple
T16958432
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kalabari Ijo |
E411363
|
entity |
| Predicate | closelyRelatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Okrika language |
E407506
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Okrika language | Statement: [Kalabari Ijo, closelyRelatedTo, Okrika language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Okrika language Context triple: [Kalabari Ijo, closelyRelatedTo, Okrika language]
-
A.
Okrika language
chosen
The Okrika language is an Ijaw language spoken primarily by the Okrika people in Rivers State, Nigeria, along the Niger Delta.
-
B.
Okwanuchu language
The Okwanuchu language is an extinct Native American tongue once spoken in northern California, belonging to the Shastan family.
-
C.
Akweya language
Akweya language is a Niger-Congo language spoken by the Akweya people of central Nigeria and classified within the Idomoid branch.
-
D.
Ogoni languages
Ogoni languages are a small group of closely related Niger-Congo languages spoken by the Ogoni people in the Niger Delta region of southern Nigeria.
-
E.
Otukpo language
The Otukpo language is a Niger-Congo language spoken by the Otukpo people of central Nigeria and is part of the Idomoid branch.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886c9c9d481909afe222093641cae |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3d01e420881909be1d93d7d6772fd |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:40 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00d468f5048190aa43b212ec7a7306 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 6:54 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:31 a.m.