Triple

T16938903
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Southern Crescent E410898 entity
Predicate introducedFromCombinationOf P125309 FINISHED
Object Crescent LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Crescent | Statement: [Southern Crescent, introducedFromCombinationOf, Crescent]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: introducedFromCombinationOf
Context triple: [Southern Crescent, introducedFromCombinationOf, Crescent]
  • A. originalCombinationFor
    Indicates that one entity is the initial or source combination from which another combined entity is derived or constructed.
  • B. knownForCombining
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is recognized or notable for bringing together or merging multiple elements, entities, or aspects into a unified whole.
  • C. laterCombination
    Indicates that one entity is a combination or composite that occurs after, or is formed subsequent to, another entity or state.
  • D. combinedIn
    Indicates that two or more entities are merged, joined, or used together to form a single combined whole or context.
  • E. combinationType
    Indicates how multiple elements are combined or related to each other within a composite structure or operation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886c886688190967be07322597ac9 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3cf2c44288190a105761ae646989e completed April 18, 2026, 6:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e32b9aa8748190b248890aca86753d completed April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e355722040819098830dabf207ecd6 completed April 18, 2026, 9:57 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:31 a.m.