Triple
T16932710
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Phil Rizzuto |
E410750
|
entity |
| Predicate | broadcastCatchphrase |
P74838
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Holy cow! |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Holy cow! | Statement: [Phil Rizzuto, broadcastCatchphrase, Holy cow!]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: broadcastCatchphrase Context triple: [Phil Rizzuto, broadcastCatchphrase, Holy cow!]
-
A.
openingCatchphrase
Indicates that one entity is a characteristic phrase or line regularly used by another entity at the beginning of a recurring performance, appearance, or communication.
-
B.
featuresCatchphrase
Indicates that an entity prominently includes or is associated with a particular catchphrase.
-
C.
hasCatchphraseStyle
Indicates that an entity’s catchphrase conforms to, or is characterized by, a particular stylistic pattern or manner of expression.
-
D.
characterCatchphrase
chosen
Indicates that a particular phrase is commonly and distinctively used by a character as their catchphrase.
-
E.
broadcastVia
Indicates that an action, message, or content is transmitted or disseminated through a specified medium, channel, or platform.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886c886688190967be07322597ac9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3cf2650e08190b669d0cf2cf1275b |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e32b982f548190b08414d55810de19 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:30 a.m.