Triple
T16920058
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ares Vallis |
E410421
|
entity |
| Predicate | erosionalStyle |
P38602
|
FINISHED |
| Object | outflow-channel morphology |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: outflow-channel morphology | Statement: [Ares Vallis, erosionalStyle, outflow-channel morphology]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: erosionalStyle Context triple: [Ares Vallis, erosionalStyle, outflow-channel morphology]
-
A.
erosionAgent
Indicates the natural force or process responsible for wearing away, transporting, or reshaping material from a surface.
-
B.
erosionRate
Indicates the rate at which material is worn away or removed from a surface over time due to erosive processes.
-
C.
weatheringStyle
Indicates the characteristic manner or pattern in which something undergoes weathering or surface degradation over time.
-
D.
erosionResistance
Indicates how strongly one entity can withstand or prevent being worn away, degraded, or removed by erosive forces caused by another entity or the environment.
-
E.
hasErosionFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity exhibits or contains a specific erosion-related feature or form resulting from erosional processes.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886c7b1e481908c3766dfa8c13458 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3cded2f8481909a20cc08b47e922e |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e32b982f548190b08414d55810de19 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:30 a.m.