Triple
T16904210
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Torrance County |
E424516
|
entity |
| Predicate | borders |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lincoln County |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lincoln County | Statement: [Torrance County, borders, Lincoln County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lincoln County Context triple: [Torrance County, borders, Lincoln County]
-
A.
Lincoln County
chosen
Lincoln County is a county in south-central New Mexico known historically for the Lincoln County War and its association with figures like Billy the Kid.
-
B.
Lincoln County
Lincoln County is a county-level jurisdiction in the U.S. state of Mississippi, with Brookhaven as its county seat.
-
C.
Lincoln County
Lincoln County is a county in central Oklahoma known for its mix of small towns, agricultural land, and proximity to the Oklahoma City metropolitan area.
-
D.
Lincoln County
Lincoln County is a coastal county in Maine known for its historic towns, maritime heritage, and scenic Midcoast landscapes.
-
E.
Lincoln County
Lincoln County is a rapidly growing county in southeastern South Dakota that forms part of the Sioux Falls metropolitan area.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889da3e8c8190a2b118f383f0beac |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3c8de3070819085bfe9696bc887ea |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:30 a.m.