Triple
T1689092
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lynch v. Donnelly |
E36509
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesTest |
P23056
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lemon test |
E32822
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lemon test | Statement: [Lynch v. Donnelly, usesTest, Lemon test]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lemon test Context triple: [Lynch v. Donnelly, usesTest, Lemon test]
-
A.
Lemon test
chosen
The Lemon test is a three-pronged legal standard used by U.S. courts to determine whether a government action violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
-
B.
Noerr-Pennington doctrine
The Noerr-Pennington doctrine is a U.S. legal principle that shields individuals and entities from antitrust liability when they petition the government, even if their efforts have anticompetitive effects.
-
C.
Agostini v. Felton
Agostini v. Felton is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that reshaped Establishment Clause doctrine by allowing public school teachers to provide remedial instruction in religious schools under certain safeguards.
-
D.
Rule of Four
The Rule of Four refers to the system of government established by the Roman emperor Diocletian in which the empire was jointly ruled by two senior emperors (Augusti) and two junior emperors (Caesares).
-
E.
Timbs v. Indiana
Timbs v. Indiana is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesTest Context triple: [Lynch v. Donnelly, usesTest, Lemon test]
-
A.
isUsedToTest
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as a means or tool for evaluating, examining, or verifying another entity.
-
B.
testsIn
Indicates that one entity conducts or performs tests within, on, or using another entity.
-
C.
tests
Indicates that one entity examines, evaluates, or checks another entity or condition to determine its properties, performance, or correctness.
-
D.
appliedTest
Indicates that a test has been administered or carried out on a particular subject or object.
-
E.
commonTest
Indicates that two or more entities share the same test, testing procedure, or evaluation in common.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a886151508819084fa7f1ce6e05577 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aaf3359ce48190803b322db8ad6027 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ad7992792081909af4312ae8a448a2 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61b71cec8190b273588051058ebd |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:29 p.m.