Triple

T1689092
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lynch v. Donnelly E36509 entity
Predicate usesTest P23056 FINISHED
Object Lemon test E32822 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lemon test | Statement: [Lynch v. Donnelly, usesTest, Lemon test]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lemon test
Context triple: [Lynch v. Donnelly, usesTest, Lemon test]
  • A. Lemon test chosen
    The Lemon test is a three-pronged legal standard used by U.S. courts to determine whether a government action violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
  • B. Noerr-Pennington doctrine
    The Noerr-Pennington doctrine is a U.S. legal principle that shields individuals and entities from antitrust liability when they petition the government, even if their efforts have anticompetitive effects.
  • C. Agostini v. Felton
    Agostini v. Felton is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that reshaped Establishment Clause doctrine by allowing public school teachers to provide remedial instruction in religious schools under certain safeguards.
  • D. Rule of Four
    The Rule of Four refers to the system of government established by the Roman emperor Diocletian in which the empire was jointly ruled by two senior emperors (Augusti) and two junior emperors (Caesares).
  • E. Timbs v. Indiana
    Timbs v. Indiana is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesTest
Context triple: [Lynch v. Donnelly, usesTest, Lemon test]
  • A. isUsedToTest chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as a means or tool for evaluating, examining, or verifying another entity.
  • B. testsIn
    Indicates that one entity conducts or performs tests within, on, or using another entity.
  • C. tests
    Indicates that one entity examines, evaluates, or checks another entity or condition to determine its properties, performance, or correctness.
  • D. appliedTest
    Indicates that a test has been administered or carried out on a particular subject or object.
  • E. commonTest
    Indicates that two or more entities share the same test, testing procedure, or evaluation in common.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a886151508819084fa7f1ce6e05577 completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aaf3359ce48190803b322db8ad6027 completed March 6, 2026, 3:31 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ad7992792081909af4312ae8a448a2 completed March 8, 2026, 1:28 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aa61b71cec8190b273588051058ebd completed March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:29 p.m.