Triple
T16886639
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | South China tiger |
E421556
|
entity |
| Predicate | possiblyExtinctInTheWild |
P124856
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [South China tiger, possiblyExtinctInTheWild, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: possiblyExtinctInTheWild Context triple: [South China tiger, possiblyExtinctInTheWild, true]
-
A.
possiblyExtinctBy
Indicates that an entity is believed or suspected to have gone extinct as a result of the specified cause or agent.
-
B.
isFunctionallyExtinctInTheWild
Indicates that the species no longer performs its ecological role in the wild because its population is too small, fragmented, or non-viable, even if some individuals still exist.
-
C.
wasExtinctInTheWild
Indicates that an entity no longer existed in natural habitats during a specified time, surviving only in captivity or controlled environments.
-
D.
thoughtExtinct
Indicates that something was previously believed to no longer exist or to have died out, but is now recognized or suggested to still exist.
-
E.
areEndangeredIn
Indicates that the entities are classified as endangered within a specified geographic area or jurisdiction.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889d470fc8190b4aec199636c0c56 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3bbc126e881909dae8133ad34acc9 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 5:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e32b90ec3c819099c51bb7baf2984c |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e32e2c07b081908c8fee9f5507bb9e |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:09 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:29 a.m.