Triple
T16869942
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Manning–Hunter water management area |
E410142
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsRiverSystem |
P165
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Manning River |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Manning River | Statement: [Manning–Hunter water management area, containsRiverSystem, Manning River]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsRiverSystem Context triple: [Manning–Hunter water management area, containsRiverSystem, Manning River]
-
A.
hasRiver
chosen
Indicates that a location or area contains, is traversed by, or is directly associated with a river.
-
B.
riverSystem
Indicates that one entity is a river system to which the other entity belongs or is a component (such as a tributary or segment).
-
C.
hasMajorRiverSystem
Indicates that an entity possesses or is traversed by a primary, large-scale river network that significantly characterizes its hydrology or geography.
-
D.
isWatercourseOf
Indicates that a watercourse (such as a river or stream) flows through, belongs to, or is geographically associated with a particular area or feature.
-
E.
tributarySystem
Indicates a relationship where one political entity pays regular tribute or offers deference to another, acknowledging the latter’s superior authority or status.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d88395e6c88190b22730f335107c14 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3b50b85c08190b35d1c45ee0e9675 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e32b8cbb048190878a259cc5be960e |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:24 a.m.