Triple

T16866322
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 8MM 2 E410047 entity
Predicate narrativeRelationTo P51756 FINISHED
Object continues themes of 8MM LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: continues themes of 8MM | Statement: [8MM 2, narrativeRelationTo, continues themes of 8MM]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: narrativeRelationTo
Context triple: [8MM 2, narrativeRelationTo, continues themes of 8MM]
  • A. narrativeConnection chosen
    Indicates a meaningful relationship between elements within a narrative, such as events, characters, or scenes, that links them in terms of plot, causality, or thematic continuity.
  • B. associatedWithPersonInStory
    Indicates that one entity has a connection or involvement with a specific person within the context of a story.
  • C. termRelationTo
    Indicates a general relational association between one term and another, without specifying the exact nature of that relationship.
  • D. narrativeSubject
    Indicates that an entity functions as the main subject or focal point within a narrative or story.
  • E. subjectRelation
    Indicates that one entity stands in a specified relational role or connection to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d88395e6c88190b22730f335107c14 completed April 10, 2026, 4:59 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3b5088f208190abfe937633ebe3fe completed April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e32b8cbb048190878a259cc5be960e completed April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:24 a.m.