Triple
T16860511
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Australian Air Force Cadets |
E409896
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasUniformStyle |
P46850
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Royal Australian Air Force-style uniform |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Royal Australian Air Force-style uniform | Statement: [Australian Air Force Cadets, hasUniformStyle, Royal Australian Air Force-style uniform]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUniformStyle Context triple: [Australian Air Force Cadets, hasUniformStyle, Royal Australian Air Force-style uniform]
-
A.
uniformStyle
chosen
Indicates that the related entities share the same or a consistent style, pattern, or formatting.
-
B.
hasStyle
Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular style or manner.
-
C.
hasSystemStyle
Indicates that one entity is associated with, or characterized by, a particular system-defined style of another entity.
-
D.
hasStructuralStyle
Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular architectural or structural design style.
-
E.
requiresUniformity
Indicates that one entity imposes a condition that another entity (or set of entities) must be consistent or identical in a specified aspect.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d88395e6c88190b22730f335107c14 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3b502bc048190baa5a83015407080 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e32b8cbb048190878a259cc5be960e |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:24 a.m.