Triple
T16853861
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | vignette ads |
E409737
|
entity |
| Predicate | policyRestriction |
P125239
|
FINISHED |
| Object | must not block content permanently |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: must not block content permanently | Statement: [vignette ads, policyRestriction, must not block content permanently]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: policyRestriction Context triple: [vignette ads, policyRestriction, must not block content permanently]
-
A.
policyRequirement
Indicates that one entity specifies a rule, condition, or obligation that another entity must satisfy according to a policy.
-
B.
policyException
Indicates that a specific case is exempted from or does not have to follow an otherwise applicable policy or rule.
-
C.
politicalRestriction
Indicates that there are limitations or prohibitions imposed on an entity’s political activities, rights, or participation.
-
D.
policyImplication
Indicates that one policy, decision, or condition leads to, justifies, or necessitates another policy outcome or course of action.
-
E.
restrictionOfPact
Indicates a relationship where one pact imposes limitations, conditions, or constraints on another pact or agreement.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d88395e6c88190b22730f335107c14 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3b37bbb80819086d844a313625cad |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e32b8cbb048190878a259cc5be960e |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e355722040819098830dabf207ecd6 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 9:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:24 a.m.