Triple
T16850846
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Thirroul |
E409670
|
entity |
| Predicate | electoralDistrictFederal |
P1566
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Cunningham
Cunningham is an Australian federal electoral division in New South Wales that includes coastal communities such as Thirroul and parts of the Illawarra region.
|
E1236745
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cunningham | Statement: [Thirroul, electoralDistrictFederal, Cunningham]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cunningham Context triple: [Thirroul, electoralDistrictFederal, Cunningham]
-
A.
Cunningham
Cunningham is a common Scottish surname borne by numerous notable individuals across fields such as technology, politics, sports, and the arts.
-
B.
Cuninghamme
Cuninghamme is an alternative historical or variant spelling of the surname Cunningham, a Scottish family name associated with the region of Ayrshire.
-
C.
Cooley
Cooley was a party in the landmark 1852 U.S. Supreme Court case Cooley v. Board of Wardens, which helped define the scope of state versus federal power over commerce.
-
D.
Pittman
Pittman is a surname of English origin borne by various notable individuals across politics, sports, and the arts.
-
E.
Coney Weston
Coney Weston is a small rural village and civil parish in the English county of Suffolk.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Cunningham Triple: [Thirroul, electoralDistrictFederal, Cunningham]
Generated description
Cunningham is an Australian federal electoral division in New South Wales that includes coastal communities such as Thirroul and parts of the Illawarra region.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cunningham Target entity description: Cunningham is an Australian federal electoral division in New South Wales that includes coastal communities such as Thirroul and parts of the Illawarra region.
-
A.
Cunningham
Cunningham is a common Scottish surname borne by numerous notable individuals across fields such as technology, politics, sports, and the arts.
-
B.
Cuninghamme
Cuninghamme is an alternative historical or variant spelling of the surname Cunningham, a Scottish family name associated with the region of Ayrshire.
-
C.
Cooley
Cooley was a party in the landmark 1852 U.S. Supreme Court case Cooley v. Board of Wardens, which helped define the scope of state versus federal power over commerce.
-
D.
Pittman
Pittman is a surname of English origin borne by various notable individuals across politics, sports, and the arts.
-
E.
Coney Weston
Coney Weston is a small rural village and civil parish in the English county of Suffolk.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d88395e6c88190b22730f335107c14 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3b378dda48190ab81d75f2cfe3ab3 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:38 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00bb1f02648190937c692af83843dc |
completed | May 10, 2026, 5:06 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a00bbc80d54819092de4ee363508b49 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 5:09 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a00bc633abc8190a86808986ba294ec |
completed | May 10, 2026, 5:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:24 a.m.