Triple

T1684798
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject R160 subway cars E36417 entity
Predicate designedToImprove P6555 FINISHED
Object reliability LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reliability | Statement: [R160 subway cars, designedToImprove, reliability]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designedToImprove
Context triple: [R160 subway cars, designedToImprove, reliability]
  • A. improvesOn chosen
    Indicates that one entity enhances, refines, or performs better than another entity, typically by addressing its limitations or increasing its effectiveness.
  • B. claimsToImprove
    Indicates that one entity asserts or promises that it will enhance, benefit, or make another entity better in some way.
  • C. designedToAvoid
    Indicates that something was intentionally created or configured in a way that prevents or minimizes a particular outcome, condition, or interaction.
  • D. isDesignedFor
    Indicates that one entity has been created, planned, or optimized specifically to serve the needs, purposes, or use of another entity.
  • E. designedToEvoke
    Indicates that something was intentionally created or arranged in order to elicit a particular reaction, feeling, or response from an audience or observer.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a886151508819084fa7f1ce6e05577 completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aba644070c81908745b56d981fe273 completed March 7, 2026, 4:15 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aa61b57a6881909373af287ef24799 completed March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:29 p.m.