Triple
T16845041
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Piranha Brothers |
E409513
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesHyperbole |
P69075
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [The Piranha Brothers, usesHyperbole, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesHyperbole Context triple: [The Piranha Brothers, usesHyperbole, true]
-
A.
usedHyperbolically
chosen
Indicates that the action or property is being expressed with deliberate exaggeration for emphasis or effect, rather than as a literal statement.
-
B.
exaggerates
Indicates that one entity portrays something about another entity or situation as greater, more extreme, or more significant than it actually is.
-
C.
moreExpressiveThan
Indicates that one entity conveys ideas, emotions, or information with greater richness, nuance, or clarity than another.
-
D.
rhetoricalDevice
Indicates that one entity is used as a rhetorical device in relation to another, such as a figure of speech, stylistic technique, or persuasive strategy within a discourse.
-
E.
hasIronicMeaning
Indicates that something conveys a meaning opposite to or incongruent with its literal expression, creating an ironic effect.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d883952b048190887740a980b712ed |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3b3541a008190b2a97cfea92b170f |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e32b87b4248190aaddb05e88452356 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:24 a.m.