Triple
T16837306
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Manajo |
E409315
|
entity |
| Predicate | citedAsEvidenceFor |
P85858
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sinification of early Heian literary culture |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sinification of early Heian literary culture | Statement: [Manajo, citedAsEvidenceFor, Sinification of early Heian literary culture]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: citedAsEvidenceFor Context triple: [Manajo, citedAsEvidenceFor, Sinification of early Heian literary culture]
-
A.
providesEvidenceFor
Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
-
B.
citationOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity cites, references, or formally acknowledges another entity as a source.
-
C.
usedEvidenceType
Indicates that a particular type or category of evidence was employed or relied upon in a given context or activity.
-
D.
authorshipEvidence
Indicates evidence or justification supporting a claim that one entity is the author or creator of another.
-
E.
citationIn
Indicates that one work cites, references, or otherwise acknowledges another work as a source.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d883952b048190887740a980b712ed |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3b34e080c8190bf7a236205b41db2 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e32b87b4248190aaddb05e88452356 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:23 a.m.