Triple
T16831415
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Titius–Bode law |
E409157
|
entity |
| Predicate | formulatedInYearApprox |
P13128
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1766 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1766 | Statement: [Titius–Bode law, formulatedInYearApprox, 1766]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formulatedInYearApprox Context triple: [Titius–Bode law, formulatedInYearApprox, 1766]
-
A.
formulatedInYear
chosen
Indicates the specific calendar year in which something was originally created, devised, or formally established.
-
B.
formulatedIn
Indicates that something was created, developed, or expressed within a particular context, place, or framework.
-
C.
formulatedInCentury
Indicates that something (such as an idea, theory, or work) was originally created or developed during a specified century.
-
D.
wasInventedInYear
Indicates that an entity was created or invented in a specific calendar year.
-
E.
isFormulatedBy
Indicates that something (such as a plan, idea, or substance) is created, devised, or composed by a particular agent or source.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d883952b048190887740a980b712ed |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3b317af8c8190a09cb6d60d28e342 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e32b87b4248190aaddb05e88452356 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:23 a.m.