Triple
T16830353
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Canal du Thiou |
E409131
|
entity |
| Predicate | mouth |
P407
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fier River |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fier River | Statement: [Canal du Thiou, mouth, Fier River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Fier River Context triple: [Canal du Thiou, mouth, Fier River]
-
A.
Fier River
chosen
The Fier River is a significant watercourse in southeastern France that flows through the Alps and joins the Rhône, known for its dramatic gorges and scenic landscapes.
-
B.
Vedea River
The Vedea River is a river in southern Romania that flows through several counties before emptying into the Danube.
-
C.
Farfa River
The Farfa River is a small watercourse in the Sabina region of central Italy, known for flowing through a scenic valley near the historic Abbey of Farfa.
-
D.
Sanguem River
The Sanguem River is a tributary waterway in the Indian state of Goa that feeds into the larger Zuari River system.
-
E.
Bârsa River
The Bârsa River is a tributary watercourse in central Romania that flows through the historical region of Țara Bârsei and contributes to the local hydrological network of Brașov County.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d88394566c8190b3dcbdc72935f7fa |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:59 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3b316acc881909c686add53d72388 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:23 a.m.