Triple

T16797612
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Glen Golf Club E408273 entity
Predicate hasApproximatePar P9773 FINISHED
Object 71 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 71 | Statement: [Glen Golf Club, hasApproximatePar, 71]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasApproximatePar
Context triple: [Glen Golf Club, hasApproximatePar, 71]
  • A. hasApproximateUse
    Indicates that one entity is used for a purpose that is similar to, but not exactly the same as, the use or function of another entity.
  • B. hasApproximateValue chosen
    Indicates that one entity’s value is close to, but not exactly equal to, the value of another entity within an acceptable margin of error.
  • C. holdsApproximatelyFor
    Indicates that a condition, relation, or value is valid only to an approximate degree or within a tolerance, rather than holding exactly.
  • D. hasApproximateShape
    Indicates that one entity has a shape that is similar to, but not exactly the same as, the shape of another entity.
  • E. containsApproximately
    Indicates that one entity holds or includes another entity in a quantity or proportion that is close to, but not exactly, a specified amount.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d88393905081908d00a86b99996ac8 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3b2ab08e8819097072a23c4a62392 completed April 18, 2026, 4:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e319d0fdb8819088425bd82431640f completed April 18, 2026, 5:42 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:22 a.m.