Triple
T1678184
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mr. Bean |
E36279
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalDialogueStyle |
P32673
|
FINISHED |
| Object | minimal speech |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: minimal speech | Statement: [Mr. Bean, typicalDialogueStyle, minimal speech]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalDialogueStyle Context triple: [Mr. Bean, typicalDialogueStyle, minimal speech]
-
A.
typicalSpeaker
Indicates that the subject is a prototypical or characteristic speaker or source of utterances in the context of the object.
-
B.
dialogueWith
Indicates that two entities are engaged in a mutual conversational exchange or dialogue with each other.
-
C.
negotiationStyleDescribedAs
Indicates that an entity’s approach to negotiation is characterized or labeled using a particular style or descriptor.
-
D.
roleInDialogue
Indicates that an entity participates in a dialogue with a specific conversational role (e.g., speaker, listener, moderator) relative to other participants.
-
E.
typicalRole
Indicates that one entity serves as the usual, characteristic, or commonly expected role or function of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a886139ed081909af0940aa9313512 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aba644070c81908745b56d981fe273 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61b57a6881909373af287ef24799 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69aba641e6a881909645577e72b53df2 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:14 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:29 p.m.